Final Exam Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1

Final Exam Questions - Essay Example This paper examines Daniel Cohen`s argument vs. Alison Jaggar`s argument regarding globalization. Cohen deals with a very important and timely subject or topic for that matter – globalization – though he does so inefficiently. The title of his book leads one to think that Cohen will actually defend globalization from its enemies or pinpoint those enemies and pronounce their arguments. Nonetheless, the book offers, at best, a somehow weak defense of the topic – global capitalism. Cohen does not openly identify enemies of globalization and their agenda. Cohen puts the present wave of globalization in an historical perspective. He tries to explain why poor countries have failed to be like developed nations and what possibly the world can do to make globalization be more beneficial. Cohen claims that globalization, thanks to the enormous speed of the 21st century communications, presents to the people a world with material prosperity which everyone wants. That is, a vivid world full of promises that are not yet fulfilled. For the poorest developing countries, globalization remains just an elusive image. Economist Daniel Cohen opposes the idea that globalization is something that is imposed and meant to exploit poor nations. Instead, he offers an innovative concept to make globalization benefit the poor. According to Cohen (2006), to understanding the modern globalization requires us to reject the idea that poor nations are exploited and stunted by globalization. Undoubtedly, rich nations protectionist practices and prejudiced trade terms negatively impact poor nations, but these nations stay poor just because they have nothing or very little that the richer countries desire or need. Cohen equates the condition of the poor nations to that of â€Å"persons lost inside French welfare system.† Cohen asserts that

Henry VIII Essay Example for Free

Henry VIII Essay 1. Did Henry VIII have the right to manage his marriages to his own advantage? In my opinion, I do not think so.   While it is understandable he needed a son to succeed him and to continue the Tudor name, he did not have the right manage his marriages for the sake of political expediency.   It is also revealed in studies made on the history of the Tudors is that Henry VIII was notoriously licentious.   His authority as king did not give him the right to change the rules. At the time, England was Catholic and it turned to Rome for moral guidance and when Henry did not get annulment, he changed policy and subordinated the church of England under him and his successors and this was all because he could not have a son.   Furthermore, he executed two of his wives and ironically, one of them, Anne Boleyn, produced his eventual successor, his daughter who would become Elizabeth I, one of England’s greatest monarchs. 2. Should a royal figure be held to a different moral code than his spouse and subjects? Why or why not? No.   Monarchs, regardless of their title, are still human.   Their title and privileges do not make them infallible.   They are also human and therefore prone to error.   They should not hide behind their authority to justify their wrongdoings as what most of them did in history.   They have to answer to someone and unfortunately, they cannot use God.   This is the reason why the philosophers of the Enlightenment eschewed the Divine Right theory when they saw it being abused. If monarchs believed they were ordained by God, how come their people hate them? If monarchs are considered beyond reproach, one needs to wonder why Louis XI was overthrown during the French Revolution or Charles I of England and Tsar Nicholas II of Russia were executed.   These examples demonstrate that the Divine Right is passà © and the reason why some monarchies cease to exist. Those that do exist are prudent enough to relinquish most of their power when they senses the changing times.

Admissions Essay: Why Ob/Gyn? -- Medicine College Admissions Essays

Admissions Essay: Why Ob/Gyn? Â   I'm having trouble coming up with that concise, compelling anecdote about the patient who inspired me to go into Obstetrics and Gynecology, because so many people have helped me realize that this is where I belong. Â   There are the women whose babies I've delivered, whom I've gotten to know at a clinic visit or during the early contractions of active labor, and then coached through the calm between pushes in the last few minutes before delivery. There are the teenagers at their first Gyn exam, nervously kicking the end of the table as we talk about safer sex, the benefits of the pill and just what a speculum actually is. And there are the patients who are very, very sick - the 44-year-old with metastatic ovarian cancer, whose family was ... ...ood prenatal care. Â   Ultimately, I hope to join the faculty of an academic medical center, where I can combine patient care with my love of teaching, and where I can continue to explore how interactive technologies can inform and empower patients. Most of all, however, I look forward to taking care of my patients, drawing on the remarkable depth and breadth of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Great Gatsby :: essays research papers

The Two Faces of Gatsby’s Parties   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  During the 1920’s, everyone is making easy money off the stock market and lives their lives to the fullest potential. The decade, also known as the Jazz Age, brings a lot of glamour into many households; one of which belongs to Jay Gatsby. In the novel The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Gatsby shows his wealth by arranging humongous parties every so often. At these parties most of the people who are in attendance are uninvited, but at the same time are also very rich. Although Gatsby’s parties and the wealth they represent are initially portrayed as alluring and glamorous, in Chapter 3 Fitzgerald subtly undercuts the apparent allure and glamour of both through specific words and images he uses to describe the party scene and the behavior of the partygoers.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The scene appears alluring and glamorous, yet there is a subtext, an undercurrent of negative images and commentary running through much of Fitzgerald’s description which undercuts the apparent allure and glamour, suggesting the destructive side of wealth. Both, the positive and the negative images are represented when the servants, the setting and the entertainment are being described in the chapter. Behind the scenes of a beautiful party, there are those that do not have much fun; they are the hard working servants. These servants work long before the party starts to get it set up and during the party to keep everyone happy. Before the party starts the servants have the job of driving people over to the Gatsby’s house, and it is described in a following manner, â€Å"On week-ends his Rolls-Royce became an omnibus, bearing parties to and from the city†¦while his station wagon scampered like a brisk yellow bug to meet all trains.† From th e impression, it seems like a normal preparation for the party which actually makes it sound very courteous, but a closer look at the description also reveals the hard work that the servants do in order to keep these parties on track. They are like a â€Å"brisk yellow bug† in a way that they give it their all to get their job done, but at the same time they are unappreciated and can be squashed like a â€Å"bug† when their services are not required anymore. During the preparations for the party and the clean up from the old one, there is another huge example of the mistreatment of the servants, â€Å"[servants] toiled all day with mops and scrubbing-brushes and hammers and garden shears, repairing the ravages of the night before.

The novel, Fahrenheit 451 reflects Ray Bradbury’s concern for decline of individual thought among his society

The novel, Fahrenheit 451 reflects Ray Bradbury's concern for decline of individual thought among his society. According to Captain Beatty, the head of the fire station â€Å"technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure carried the trick† of replacing independent thought with conformity and finally leading to censorship (Bradbury, 58). Bradbury wants readers to notice these potential hazards in his fictional world and to beware of them in their own society. Technology in Fahrenheit 451 and today is seen as a great threat to individual thought. Even though the society that Bradbury depicts in the novel is very extreme, it warns the reader of the dangers of technology. Mildred, Montag's wife is taken over by the media and escapes form her life through the modern technologies. According to Clarisse, people no longer think or talk about anything important, â€Å"No, not anything. They name a lot of cars or swimming pools mostly and say how swell. But they all say the same things and nobody says anything different from anyone else† (Bradbury, 31). Similarly today many have turned into mindless human beings by sitting in front of the television or computer. The fast cars, loud music, advertisements and other forms of technological advances have created a lifestyle with too much stimulation in which no one has the time to think. (http://www. sparknotes. com/lit/451/themes. html) For example, Beatty explains that when zippers replace buttons â€Å"a man lacks just that much time to think while dressing at dawn† (Bradbury, 57) In Fahrenheit 451 minority pressure plays an important role in the decline of individual thought. This issue is still relevant today. For instance various pressure groups' campaigns against sex and violence on television or hard rock music have great influence on the types of programs and music people watch and listen to. Beatty explains to Montag that in the past pressure groups were influential in ending free expression, which eventually allowed the government to begin censoring its citizen. â€Å"Bigger the population, the more minorities. Don't step on the toes of the dog lovers, cat lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchants, chiefs, Mormons, Baptists, Unitarians, second-generation Chinese, Swedes, Italians, Germans, Texans†¦ (Bradbury, 57). Despite the obvious role of minority pressure in the decline of thought, the novel suggests mass exploitation to be the more serious problem. While minority pressure comes from a few members of the public, exploitation comes from the majority of the population. â€Å"Publishers, exploiters, broadcasters† sense the public's desire for relaxation and pleasure and exploit mindless types of entertainment for profit (http://ipl. ulis. ac. jp:8001/cgi-bin/ref/litcrit/litcrit. out. pl? ti=fah-198. This suggests that even more dangerous than the pressure groups is the public's desire for comfort and pleasure. Beatty's discussion of minority pressure is very explicit and clear however, his discussion of mass exploitation is more implicit and is scattered through ten pages. Mass exploitation speeds up the decline of thought even more directly than minority pressure. While pressure groups may manipulate people to avoid gaining knowledge, entertainment provides an alternative to any difficult thought (http://www. pinkmonkey. om/booknotes/monkeynotes. com) The types of entertainment exploited in Fahrenheit 451 are only produced for the public's relaxation and pleasure. The simplification of intellectual challenges and use of drugs are the most basic kinds of exploitation in the novel, which are still common in today's society. Beatty explains that intellectually challenging works were made easier so that they would appeal to a larger audience. This is similar to the way Hollywood producers have produced many simplified motion pictures of famous pieces of literature. Films like Romeo and Juliet and Gone with the Wind are more appealing to the new generation than reading the work itself. Another type of thought destroying mass exploitation in Fahrenheit 451 as well as the real world is the common drug use. When Mildred, overdoses by taking too much sleeping peels the medics, who replace her blood tell Montag, â€Å"We get these cases nine or ten a night. Got so many, starting a few years ago, we had the special machines built† (Bradbury, 15), which suggests that use of drugs is common. It is obvious to see that Bradbury recognizes drugs as a threat to individual thought. Montag smokes early on in the novel (Bradbury, 24), but as he becomes wiser his habit disappears, which shows that smoking was partially responsible for his ignorance in the beginning. Fahrenheit 451 demonstrates the author's extreme sensitivity to any attempts of restricting freedom of expression. He uses a dystopian setting to warn people of the dangers of technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure and considers them as threats to individual thought. Moreover, Fahrenheit 451 is an excellent social critique novel, which contributes to positive changes in society.

Symbolism in The Great Gatsby essays

Symbolism in The Great Gatsby essays What use does Fitzgerald make of symbolism in the novel? Francis Scott Fitzgerald is the author of the The Great Gatsby. The novel takes place during the 1920s or as it is also known The Jazz Age and it is set in Long Island and New York. Many important things were happening in America. For example, a cultural revolution burst out and the stock market boomed making many Americans rich, thus giving them the opportunities to waste their money in huge parties and expensive things. The reader is given the point of view of the narrator, Nick Carraway, because he narrates the story in first person. He is very objective when giving his opinions and he describes only what he observes around him at that same time. In order to express the ideas in the novel, the author uses a lot of symbolism. A symbol is an element of imagery, in which a real object stand not only for itself but for some abstract idea as well. They can be objects, figures, or colors that can represent a variety of things. The author uses symbols all over the novel to enhance th e conflicts between the characters, thus reflecting some of the main themes in the novel. He also uses it to help the reader imagine and understand the things that are happening. The green light represent hopes and dreams, the eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg symbolize the eyes of God, and the Valley of Ashes represent the corruption and decadence of society. A central theme of the novel I think, is the idea that people arent satisfied with what they have, they are always going further and further, never knowing when to stop, and always determined to achieve dreams that seemed so close that he could hardly fail to grasp it. Gatsby has spent his whole life longing for better things like money, success, acceptance, and Daisy, but no matter how much he has never felt complete. Even when he has his large house full of interesting people and all of their...

Romeo Juliet Socratic Seminar Entry Ticket Essays

Romeo Juliet Socratic Seminar Entry Ticket Essays Romeo Juliet Socratic Seminar Entry Ticket Essay Romeo Juliet Socratic Seminar Entry Ticket Essay Upon fir SST seeing Juliet, e asks to a Serviceman, What ladys that, which doth enrich / the hand / Of yonder knight? (II, v, 3840). Romeo immediately spots Juliet across the dance floor and is mess merited by her beauty. Juliet is young and naive, so when Juliet meets the very attractive Romeo, she too, falls in love with him at first sight. After having not met each other for not even a full day, they essentially decide to get married, despite knowing the identities of each other and the feuds that occur between their two families. In , love is an overpowering force that prevails over all other values, loyalties, and emotions. Romeo and Juliet are starched lovers and this is a f act that can never be changed fate controls them forever. When Juliet hears about Rome gos banishment from Verona, she does not even care that this was because he killed her ova,JNI cousin Table she is just glad that Romeo is still alive. Upon hearing of her arranged marriage e with Paris by her parents, shed rather commit suicide than be with him because she is lealer day married to her love, Romeo. She does not even take into consideration her parents wish sees for her wellbeing that they have her marry Paris, all because of her unbreakable love with Romeo. When Romeo hears news of Gullets death, he acts in haste because his beloved d Juliet is no longer with him in this world. He says, Well, Juliet, will lie with thee tonight. / Lets see for means (V,I, 3435). Instantly, he decides to commit suicide at Gullets side. Blind deed by his love for her, he disregards everything and wishes to die so that he can join Julia et in her grave to die together and never be separated from her. ) Friar Laurence plays the part of a wise adviser to Romeo and Juliet , along with aiding in major plot developments. Alone, he foreshadows the later, tragic events of the play with his liquor about plants and their similarities to humans. When Romeo requests the Friar marry him to , he is shocked, because only days before, Romeo had been infatuated with Rosalie a woman who did not return his love. Nev ertheless, Friar Laurence decides to marry Romeo and Juliet in the attempt to stop the civil fee du between the Capsules and the Montague . When Romeo is banished for killing Table and flees to Mantra , Friar Laurence tries to help the Non lovers get back. Prince says, We have still known thee for a holy man. 3) Romeos decision to approach Juliet on her balcony is fraught with consensus hat Juliet makes very clear, basically telling him that he will face death if her f amply spots him there. It is also true, however, that Juliet pushes Romeo to declare h is intent to marry her. I suppose she does this knowing that her parents want her to m et Paris, but it is a hasty decision, and one which leads to their deaths. If he had not been banished, the whole Juliet faking her death would have goon e down much differently, because Romeo could have been close at hand and known t he details. For me, the most impact choice is Gullets decision not to share her plan wit h the Nurse. Had she done so, the Nurse, as she has done so often, would have pro detected Juliet. Even though she told Juliet to forget about Romeo and marry Paris (eve n after Juliet was married), her motivation was to see Juliet happy. With Juliet since SSH e was born, she adored her and, like her mother, was brokenhearted to see Juliet so unhappy. The Nurse was even resentful of Romeos hand in Tables death, buy t for Juliet, she would eventually have gotten over it. However, because Juliet does not take the Nurse into her confidence, there is no one at her side when Romeo shows up. It seems safe to assume that the Nurse would have been there waiting, though certainly Friar Lawrence should have been. Having backup plan in place would have saved Gullets life, and she and Romeo could have run away together until their parents got over losing them both. The marriage of Romeo and Juliet which occurs only a blink of an eye after t hey meet is the most devastating action they take. For, after this act of union, Romeo a ND Juliet have committed themselves to one path and cannot change or return to not her. Were they not married, Romeo would not have tried to calm Table, and Mercuric may not have died. Were they not married, Juliet would not have been faced with the d lemma of what to do about marrying Paris. If Romeo and Juliet were more gradual about expressing their love, perhaps t hey could have eased their parents into the idea of their loving someone who has long b en declared an enemy. Perhaps the choice with the most impact was the decision to keep this relation unships and marriage a secret. Romeo and Juliet basically eloped. Their parents and the p urine were unaware of their decision. Perhaps the marriage might have been prove need if the families were aware. Perhaps the feuding would have stopped or at least Oslo deed. Certainly Romeo and Juliet wouldnt have ended up in the same situation if the eye had been honest about their relationship Romeos initial choice to court Juliet despite the feed between their families s memos like the most significant choice of the play. Essentially all of the action (and turmoil I and tragedy) of the play stems from this decision. Hint the choice Of Romeo to have gone to the party, and after leaving the pa arty he decided to talk to Juliet is the crucial turning point. If he had been turned away y from seeking her attention at some point, the rest of the story would never have ha penned. L also believe the fact that Romeo could not tell his parents about his love, and when he killed gullets cousin that was a great turning point as you can never go back oaf terror have done that. 4) Most of the events that happen in Romeo and Juliet lead up to the final con occlusion of the couple dying. Many, if not all, Of the characters also play an ultimate role in the Eire tragic deaths. The characters that cause the most dramatic effect upon Romeo and Gullets d death are Friar Laurence, Table, and Gullets father, Lord Caplet. Friar Laurence marries Room e and Juliet, which causes most of the problems, since they always want to be together, eve en though it is very difficult for them to accomplish this. Table is the reason Romeo is to be banished, and Gullets parents are the cause for Juliet to become enraged and make rash decide sons. Friar Laurence plays a very large role in the deaths of Romeo and Juliet since he baa socially is the go between man in this play. First off, he marries the two actresses lover The rest of the events in the story tumble down from here since nothing see ms to ever go right for both Romeo and Juliet. The Friar gives Juliet a potion, which is intend deed not to kill re, but allow to her to run away and have a better life with Romeo. It does en d up causing them both to die, since there is much confusion and immix. The letter the Fri. r sent did not get to Romeo in time, causing him to become extremely upset and to kill him elf. Secondly, Table, his hatred towards the Montague family, and the actions he takes end s in Romeo being banished. When Table strikes Mercuric down with his sword, Mercuric says, Why the devil came you between us? I was hurt under your arm(act Ill, SC I, 9798), Or memo feels guilty and decides to avenge his friend by killing Table. As a result, he become s banished, which in turn, devastates Juliet, causing her to feel hopeless and suicidal. With Romeo gone from their town of Verona, news cannot reach him easily therefore communion action becomes difficult. This road block causes him to get the news of Juliet being dead, eve n though she is not. This causes both of them to make bad choices that end in their deaths. L ghastly, Lord Caplet, Gullets father, causes Juliet to become so flustered and sad, that she decides to take drastic actions and fake her own death. Gullets usual obeying behavior is cruse heed when she finds out of her fathers plans for her to marry Paris. She becomes upset, and decides to just lie about being excited and happy, in order to trick her parents. With a rash d session, she fakes her death. This causes Romeo to become misled and inevitably kill him elf. When Juliet awakens from her deathlike slumber, she sees Romeo dead and in devastates n, kills herself as well. Almost every decision leads up to the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, and there a few characters that also play a very large part in their deaths. These character s are Friar Laurence, Table, and Lord Caplet, and they assist fate in succeeding in not al lowing Romeo and Juliet to be together. Of course, in real life, communication is much easier to come by with the use of phones, computers, and faster methods of transportation. Love e a very difficult thing, especially when there are outside forces not wanting you, and y our lover, to be together like in Romeo and Gullets situation. In the final scene, the Prince speaks rightly when he blames Lords Caplet an d Montague for not only Romeos and Gullets deaths, but also for the deaths of the Princes o won relatives. The Prince blames their hatred and their feud for all of these deaths. We see t his accusation in the princes lines: Where be these enemies? Caplet, Montage, See what a scourge is laid upon your hate, That heaven finds means to kill your joys with love! And l, for winking tatty, discords too, Have lost a brace of kinsmen. All are punished. (Act 5, Scene 3) However, others are also indirectly responsible for Romeos and Gullets death s. While Friar Laurence broke no law nor holy sanction in marrying Romeo and Juliet without t parental consent, even though his motive seems noble, one has to question the sensei lenses of his decision. Friar Laurence agrees to marry them because he believed the Lillian CE may so happy prove, / To turn your households rancorous to pure love. In other words, he believed that uniting Romeo and Juliet in wedlock would put an end to the feud. The flag win his plan is that the marriage was performed in secret with no immediate plan unveil the marriage. Had he been wiser, he would have foreseen that the ongoing feud would prevent any real relationship between Romeo and Juliet, sabotaging his efforts to create peace. Instead, he should have postponed the marriage until he, himself, could prepare Lords Caplet and M Montague for the union. Friar Laurence continued to make things even worse by lying to Lord C applet in eloping Juliet fake her death. For all of these reasons Friar Laurence is indirect lay responsible for their deaths. However, he is rightly pardoned by the Prince, because ultimo tell, their deaths are the fault of Lords Caplet and Montague. Table is also indirectly responsible. Had he not had such a hotheaded temper and instead agreed with his uncle to let Romeo alone for crashing the ball, Table, as well a s Rome and Juliet, would have remained alive. Tables death led to Romeos banishment, which led to both his and Gullets deaths. Finally the Prince also holds himself indirectly responsible because he did not heck Lords Caplet and Montague sooner, nor try to stop the feud sooner. His personal b lame is seen in the line, and l, for winking at you, discords too, / Have lost a brace of kinsmen. 6) Metaphors . What, ho! You men, you beasts,That quench the fire of your pernicious rage (Act 1 Scene 1) The Prince compares the Capsules and Montague to beasts, because they have just had a fray. He then compares their rage to a fire. 2. Peered forth the golden window of the east, (Act 1 Scene 1) Benevolent is telling the Montague where Romeo is, and compares the east to a golden Indo when talking about the sun. 3. My lips, two blushing pilgrims, ready stand To smooth that rough touch with a tender kiss (Act 1 scene 5) Romeo compares his lips to pilgrims when talking to Juliet. Similes . Is love a tender thing? It is too rough, Too rude, too boisterous, and it pricks like thorn. (Act 1 Scene 4) Romeo is talking to Mercuric before the Capsules party, and compares love to a thorn. 2. Begot of nothing but vain fantasy, Which is as thin of substance as the air (Act 1 Sc ene 4) Mercuric is talking about dreams, and compares vain fantasy to the air. O, she doth teach the torches to burn bright! It Seems she hangs upon the cheek of night Like a rich jewel in an Tiptoes ear (Act 1 Scene 5) When Romeo describes Juliet, he compares her to a rich jewel in an Tiptoes ear. Dramatic Irony understood by the audience but not grasped by the characters. Situational irony actions have an effect that is opposite from what was intended, so that the outcome is contrary to what was expected. Verbal Irony person says or writes one thing and means another, or uses words to convey a meaning that is the opposite Of the literal meaning.